First, we assess finance depth in the context of the business model. That includes controllership, reporting, audit readiness, internal controls, treasury, tax, liquidity planning, FP&A, systems literacy and the ability to build a reliable fact base for decision-making. The question is not whether a candidate has touched these areas, but whether they have led them at the required level of complexity.
Second, we assess strategic and commercial contribution. Strong CFOs influence pricing, capital allocation, portfolio choices, investment cases and operating priorities. They can simplify complexity for boards and investors, translate financial insight into commercial action, and support a CEO without becoming either a passive reporter or an unconstructive gatekeeper.
Third, we look at transformation capability. Many finance leaders have managed stable functions; fewer have rebuilt one. We test evidence around ERP programmes, finance automation, shared services, data quality, KPI redesign, post-merger integration, cost reduction, working capital improvement and organisational redesign. In changing environments, these capabilities can matter as much as classic technical credibility.
Finally, we assess leadership under pressure. This is where a specialist search partner adds more value than a generic CFO headhunter. We look for judgement, resilience, candour, stakeholder influence, team-building ability and cultural range across geographies and operating styles. The best CFOs can challenge constructively, stay calm in ambiguity and create trust with boards, management teams and investors alike.